Late last week the Minnesota State High School League, the body responsible for governing High School sports in Minnesota voted
48-0 to implement a new policy for student athletes who transfer to another school district after 9th grade.
Seventy-two hours after the Minnesota State High School League finalized
new rules to tighten eligibility restrictions on athletes who change
schools, the Minnesota Legislature took the first step toward overruling
that action. By a 3-2 vote Monday, a House subcommittee approved a bill that
would make it illegal to limit the eligibility of any transfer students. The
Disparities in Student Support and Service subcommittee moved the measure
forward to the K-12 Finance Committee, which could hear the bill next week.
Last Friday the MSHSL representative assembly voted 48-0 to enact the
new rule, which is scheduled to take affect for the 2007-08 school year. It
forces athletes who change schools without a change of residence to sit out
varsity competition for one year. Under the current rule there is no penalty
for first-time transfers; students who transfer a second time must sit out
half their varsity season. A bill in the Senate that was a companion to the
House bill was defeated in committee earlier this month. Should legislation
be resurrected in the Senate, move through both chambers and become law, it
would remove all restrictions on eligibility and might allow athletes to
compete for more than one school during one season.
Who are these rabblerousers who want to limit parents (oh, I mean student athletes) from traipsing from one school to another to showcase their skills? The esteemed Debra Hilstrom, DFL-Brooklyn Center classifies them as such "When you look at the makeup of the people that are on that committee, it is primarily made up of coaches, athletic directors, principals, those kinds of things," she said. " Of course! The coaches, principals and athletic directors have no idea of how these things work and how their school districts are affected. But don't take my word for it. Here is a link to the by law . I especially appreciated the last paragraph
address the belief that students who live in a community should be the ones representing their school and that they should not be immediately displaced by others who choose to attend a school but who do not reside in the community
From the time they are in kindergarten, many kids dream of playing for their high school team. For some, they are just not good enough to make the cut. But the cut is especially deep for those who are shut out by athletes who abuse the open enrollment option because they won't be a star athlete at their own school or want to increase their chance at college level sports by being at a school with a better program.
Open enrollment was enacted to give students a chance to improve their academic performance not a chance for student athletes or coaches to improve their team by "recruiting". Shame on the legislature for poking their noses into something that does not concern them, when they aren't able to complete their own jobs.